Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GILMORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35081
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHARLES GILMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutkowski v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2015cv00536
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rutkowski
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and Charles Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GILMORE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2013cv07157
Petitioner:
CHARLES GILMORE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Gilmore v. District Attorney Philadelphia
as 13-2724
Petitioner:
CHARLES GILMORE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Gilmore, et al v. United States Of America
as 5:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Charles Gilmore and Charmane Gilmore
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Banks et al v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
Eleazier Banks , Carley Dawson , Peggy Lewis and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GILMORE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55865
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GILMORE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GILMORE v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32222
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GILMORE
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Davis et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03127
Plaintiff:
Joy Davis, Joy Davis, Patricia Dixon and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
