Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Lawson v. Klondex Mines Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00284
Defendant:
Rodney Cooper, Mark Daniel, Jamie Haggarty and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Assad v. Klondex Mines Ltd. et al
as 2:2018cv01065
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Rodney Cooper, Mark Daniel, Jamie Haggarty and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Gunderson v. Klondex Mines Ltd. et al
as 3:2018cv00256
Defendant:
1156291 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Rodney Cooper, Mark Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
David Gunderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hicks v. The Boathouse at FSV, LLC, et al
as 4:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Louis Hicks
Defendant:
The Boathouse at FSV, LLC, Charles Oliver, II and Eugene Speed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Babbitt et al v. General Motors Company LLC
as 2:2015cv00435
Defendant:
General Motors Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Ryan Babbitt , Carla Bush , Michael Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver et al v. Burgess
as 6:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
Charles Oliver and American Equity Advisory Group, LLC
Defendant:
Steve C. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22831
Plaintiff:
Sherry Oliver and Charles Oliver
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Oliver et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22831
Plaintiff:
Sherry Oliver and Charles Oliver
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Oliver v. Billy, et al
as 13-30867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CHARLES OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE BILLY, OFFICER COCKERHAM, OFFICER MOREHOUSE and others
Timothy Oliver v. Jackson Correctional Center
as 13-30606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CHARLES OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
