Cases 11 - 20 of 442
Charles Johnson, Jr. v. Sergeant Griffie, et al
as 21-1932
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain Adams, Miller County Detention Center, Officer Burns, MCDC, Officer Ferral, MCDC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Charles Johnson, Jr. v. Nurse King, et al
as 21-1812
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer Tefft, Sergeant B. Griffie, Nurse King, Miller County Detention Center ("MCDC") and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Samuel Johnson, Jr.
Clervrain v. Brnovich et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Rachel Chapa, JA Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clervrain v. Sessions, et al
as 21-3039
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA MELLENDICK, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JEB CHARLES JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Crank v. Lumpkin
as 21-50017
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Samuel Crank
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Evans v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Warden Charles Samuels, Charles B. Webster Detention Center and Sheriff Richard Roundtree
Plaintiff:
Quint L. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Schreiber et al
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Harley G Lappin, Andre Matevousian and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
USA v. Charles Pope
as 20-5868
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SAMUEL POPE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Pope
as 20-5866
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES SAMUEL POPE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
