Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Thornton v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Charles Thornton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thornton v. Cook County Municipality et al
as 1:2012cv06141
Plaintiff:
Charles Thornton
Defendant:
Cook County Municipality, M Reyes and Sgt. Hallihan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. USA
as 1:2012cv00210
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Charles Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thornton v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Charles Thornton
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 5:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
Charles Thornton
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dossman v. Thornton et al
as 1:2011cv01735
Plaintiff:
Angela Dossman
Defendant:
Charles Thornton and Canal Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weymouth et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson, Jonathan Lee Riches and others
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weymouth et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010mc00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson, Jonathan Lee Riches and others
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thornton v. Weber
as 4:2009cv04083
Plaintiff:
Charles Thornton
Defendant:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
