Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Whitaker III v. Gaughan South LLC
as 2:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Fred Charles Whitaker III
Defendant:
Gaughan South LLC doing business as South Point Hotel and Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17935
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITAKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11430
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WHITAKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. United States Postal Service
as 0:2017cv04224
Plaintiff:
Sheree T Williams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States of America and Ricky Charles Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bemis v. Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency et al
as 1:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Bemis
Defendant:
Don Debrosky, Steven Noble, Charles Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Whitaker, et al v. Leland McEwen
as 10-73248
Petitioner:
CHARLES WHITAKER
Respondent:
LELAND MCEWEN
Grace v. Moore et al
as 5:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
Anthony Xavier Grace
Defendant:
Timothy Moore and Charles Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitaker v. Hiland et al
as 5:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitaker
Defendant:
Steve Hiland and Chanin Hiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Charles Whitaker, Rodney Moore and Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
