Cases 1 - 8 of 8
De La Cruz et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv01473
Plaintiff:
ARELIS DE LA CRUZ, JONATHAN DE LA CRUZ, CARLOS RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Joshua Moscoso, Police Officer Christian Anasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11713
Plaintiff:
Edith Reynolds, Mary Rhodes, Joseph J Riccardo and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08814
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Marion Horn v. William Ostendorf, et al
as 15-2158
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Horn
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marion Horn
Defendant:
St. Louis County, St. Louis County Police Department, Charles Dooley, County Executive and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Ostendorf, Lt. - DSN 1846, Robert Shelvy, Sargeant - DSN 0897, Joshua Lawrence, Police Officer - DSN 2022 and others
Rodriguez v. Palmero
as 1:2014cv01742
Plaintiff:
Charlie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Palmero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Charlie Rodriguez
as 12-50416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLIE RODRIGUEZ
Mango's Tropical Cafe, Inc. v. Mango Martini Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv24619
Plaintiff:
Mango's Tropical Cafe, Inc.
Defendant:
Mango Martini Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. , Lakes Cafe Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. , Jose Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
