Cases 1 - 10 of 598
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Rosa Inchausti, Andrew Ching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JE v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02204
Plaintiff:
JE and Jen Elliott
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A.Monamour, AOBRITON and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vang v. Grundhofer et al
as 0:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ching Vang
Defendant:
Alex Grundhofer, Antonio Rulli and Ramsey County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jenn-Ching Luo v. Owen J Roberts School District, et al
as 24-1031
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Defendant:
OWEN J ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SHARON W. MONTANYE, SWEET STEVENS KATZ WILLIAMS LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
