Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04894
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02715
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Chingo v. Blanche
as 26-4273
Petitioner:
OSCAR GERONIMO RODRIGUEZ-CHINGO
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Gonzalez et al v. Massimos Contracting, Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv05044
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gonzalez, Oscar Emilio Cardona Garcia, Julio Isael Gamez Reyes and others
Defendant:
Massimos Contracting, Corp., Massimo Maffei, Athena Victoria Urena Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tzoy-Tzoy, et al v. Blanche
as 26-1303
Petitioner:
SANTOS TZOY-TZOY, WENDY ELIZA TZOY-CHINGO, JUANA MARISELA CHINGO-DE LA CRUZ and others
Respondent:
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General and TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00590
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Sierra (Laford)
as 24-2269
Defendant:
JOSE GERONIMO-FIGUEROA, JOSE CRUZ, JONATHAN EVANGELISTA and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
