Cases 1 - 7 of 7
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17341
Plaintiff:
CHRIS GOODMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. Multiple John Doe Midland County Sheriff's Office Officials et al
as 7:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chad Price
Defendant:
Multiple John Doe Midland County Sheriff's Office Officials, Multiple John Doe Texas Department of Public Safety Officials, Multiple John Doe Midland Memorial Hospital Medical Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Robinson v. Stewart Condley
as 14-1962
Plaintiff:
Eva Robinson and Ron Robinson
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Matthew Robinson
Defendant:
Steven Payton, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Marshal for the City of Dover, Kristopher Stevens, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a Sergeant for the Pope County Sheriff's Department, Rod Pfeifer, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as the Chief Marshall of the City of Dover Marshal's Office and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stewart Condley, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a Corporal for the Arkansas State Police
Vellon v. Goodman
as 2:2013cv02195
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez Vellon
Defendant:
Chris Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vellon v. Goodman
as 4:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Edgar Martinez Vellon
Defendant:
Chris Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Icy Allen , Vicki Allen , Lamoncia Beasley and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
Icy Allen , All Plaintiffs , Vicki Allen and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
