Cases 21 - 30 of 305
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022ct03410
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dekota Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Robert Wilson, Officer Corbet and Officer Beady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22754
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DALE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22139
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHAWN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christopher Smith v. Jody Lamb, et al
as 22-2819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JODY LAMB, REBECCA DAVISON, WINDY LABRIE and others
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mohamed et al
as 1:2022cv03252
Defendant:
9224-3708 Quebec, Inc., Rahim Mohamed, Davies (Dave) Wong and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15293
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022mi00039
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
