Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lomas v. Gunther et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Christopher Brandon Lomas
Respondent:
Unknown Gunther and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chiles v. Keith et al
as 1:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Roderick Chiles
Defendant:
Christopher Brandon Keith, Veterans Choice LLC and Integon Indemnity Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
(PC) Davis v. Portillo et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brandon Davis
Defendant:
M. Portillo, Molina and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Portillo et al
as 1:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brandon Davis
Defendant:
M. Portillo, Molina and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SELF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37758
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRANDON SELF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Trade Commission v. Digital Income System, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv24721
Defendant:
Derek Jones Foley, Kaitlyn Scott, William Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
BROWNING v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2020cv00299
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BRANDON, D ALLEN, CRYSTAL J WINGET and others
Plaintiff:
GINO L BROWNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04245
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRANDON DOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
