Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Davis v. Bi-County Solid Waste Management Systems et al
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Bi-County Solid Waste Management Systems, Montgomery County, Tennessee and Stewart County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Heidi Washington and Unknown Nagy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00293
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pianko v. General R.V. Center, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv13371
Defendant:
Joy Fowler, LOREN BAIDAS, Christopher Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Pianko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Walker v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Walker
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, FMC Lexington, Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. USA
as 2:2017cv14187
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lawrence Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Portee v. Jones et al
as 6:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Portee
Defendant:
Rhonda Jones, Christopher Davis, T. Cimarossa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curtis v. Davis et al
as 6:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Melvin Curtis
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, Onuoha Jude, Aimee Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Portee v. Holland et al
as 6:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Portee
Defendant:
J.C. Holland, Jude Onuoha, Rhonda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
