Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pinkston v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Sy-Bron L Pinkston
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of, Susan Hughes, Christopher Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawthorne et al v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv06751
Plaintiff:
Lorine Hawthorne and Christopher Hawthorne
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Instagram LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dominguez v. City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Melina Dominguez
Defendant:
Fort Wayne Police Department, City of Fort Wayne, Christopher Hawthorne and others
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coats v. City of Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Shannon Hughes, Robert Hollo, City of Fort Wayne and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Coats
Not Yet Classified:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Hawthorne v. Commissioner, Alabama Departme, et al
as 15-10742
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HAWTHORNE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Hawthorne v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawthorne
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02887
Plaintiff:
David Allen , William Beddingfield , Darla Bell and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc, CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Allen v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
David Allen , William Beddingfield , Darla Bell and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
