Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Holden v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12599
Plaintiff:
Christopher Holden
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PS) Morgan v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00427
Defendant:
Christopher Holden, Craig Means and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Wiendi Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2015cv00481
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Joseph Haislip, Christopher Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holden v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02725
Petitioner:
Wybra Christopher Holden
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02642
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Holden v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02565
Petitioner:
Wybra Christopher Holden
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milos Leubner v. County of San Joaquin, et al
as 09-16441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILOS LEUBNER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, SAN JOAQUIN OFFICE OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, KENNETH EGGIE and others
Leubner v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2008cv00853
Plaintiff:
Milos Leubner
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, San Joaquin Office of Child Protective Services, Kenneth Eggie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
