Cases 1 - 10 of 349
Miller et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Angela Boykin
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Miller et al
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Angela Boykin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Antony Blinken
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
FEDS FOR MEDICAL FREEDOM, MARIE BALLERINI-HOUGNON, DONALD CARROLL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CAROL PEREZ, in her official capacity as Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Global Talent Bureau in the Bureau of Global Talent Management at the the U.S. Department of State and others
Miller et al v. Simien et al
as 6:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Karlie Miller
Defendant:
Brett Simien, St. Landry Parish School System and St Landry Parish School System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company v. Morrison's Imperial Investigation and Protective Services Corporation et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Morrison's Imperial Investigation and Protective Services Corporation, Christopher Miller and Gregory Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Miller et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller and Taylor Eymann
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association an interinsurance exchange doing business as USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Carter v. Miller
as 23-6660
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELLIOTT L. CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
