Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Lawyers United Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 20-5269
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Judicial Circuit Judge, James M. Lorenz, District Judge, Mark Walker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Aimee DeJesus and Lawyers United Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Allan Wainwright
Reid v. Pitt County Child Support Enforcement
as 4:2020cv00129
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reid
Defendant:
Pitt County Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REID v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43531
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REID
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Rosa v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv01128
Defendant:
Manuel Ceja, John Doe(s), Christopher Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Mariela De La Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Taylor v. Richardson
as 1:2020cv00016
Respondent:
Kendall T Richardson
Petitioner:
Christopher Reid Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2019cv00237
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Reid Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. $42,893.70 from Wells Fargo Bank Account 7886356315 et al
as 0:2019cv01568
Defendant:
$28,318.68 from US Bank Account 1196, $40,000.00 from Synchrony Bank Account 5391, 2015 Toyota Highlander, VIN 5TDJKRFH3FS197137 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Francisco J. Reid
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Reid v. Shellpoint Partners LLC
as 2:2018cv01215
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reid
Defendant:
Shellpoint Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta
Christopher Reid v. USA
as 15-3635
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER REID
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00593
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
