Cases 51 - 60 of 332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15339
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOGAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13360
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HOGAN and CHRISTOPHER S HOGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Gamble
as 22-1553
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT GAMBLE
USA v. Christopher Miller
as 22-50137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT MILLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Javens et al v. Fresenius Medical Care International et al
as 3:2022cv00666
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care, Fresenius Medical Care International, Fresenius Medical Care North America and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Javens, Jean McClellan Chambers and Others Similarly Situated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Sterusky v. Cooper
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Sterusky
Defendant:
Detrick Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 wd Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Christopher Miller v. Felicia Ponce
as 22-55374
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Judd v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Judd, Robert Mitchell Judd, Dennis Gates Miller and others
Defendant:
Quentin Miller, Jack Van Duncan, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
