Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Christopher Jones v. TN, et al
as 23-5626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, MELISSA CAMPBELL, LISA PARKS and others
Clayton et al v. Does
as 2:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Clayton and Christopher Stephen Clayton
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
STEPHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
SCOTT CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Brown
as 23-10108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Stephen Brown, also known as Madrikh Obadiah
Hogren v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stephen Hogren
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stephen Jones
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Correction, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19747
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN WINDHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEPHENS v. LEAKE
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. STEPHENS and GEORGE CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER DAWN LEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25171
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN PIERRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20508
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
