Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Carruth v. Magee et al
as 2:2021cv00040
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, City of Collins, Mississippi and Officer Paul F. Magee
Plaintiff:
Tyler Carruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howze v. Magee et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Defendant:
City of Collins, John Doe Officers and Officer Paul F. Magee
Plaintiff:
Carol Howze
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tyler Carruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Creel v. Eddie Bowen, et al
as 17-60434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WALTER CREEL
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE H. BOWEN, JIM HOOD, DANIAL C. JONES and others
Creel v. Bowen et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Walter Creel
Defendant:
Eddie H. Bowen, Jim Hood, Danial C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Dickson, Jr. v. U. S. Dept of Justice
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, In her Individual capacity, acting under Color of federal and State Law, Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962, DANA JAMES BOENTE, in his Individual capacity, acting under color of federal and state law, acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise, under The (RICO) Act of Title 18 U.S. Code 1962 and others
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.