Cases 1 - 10 of 11
School City of Mishawaka v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
School City of Mishawaka
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kleven et al v. St. Joseph County et al
as 3:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Brooke Kleven, Christopher Kleven, H.K. and others
Defendant:
St. Joseph County, Jeffrey Downey, Jennifer Stitsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Texarkana Independent School District et al v. Abbvie, Inc et al
as 1:2021op45080
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Shepherdsville, KY, Texarkana Independent School District, South Bend Community School Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Texarkana Independent School District et al v. Abbvie, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
City of Shepherdsville, KY, Texarkana Independent School District, Smith-Green Community Schools and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Zimmerman v. City of Mishawaka Indiana
as 2:2019cv00362
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Zimmerman
Defendant:
City of Mishawaka Indiana and Mishawaka City of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America et al v. City of Mishawaka
as 3:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Indiana
Defendant:
City of Mishawaka Indiana
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
In Re: MTBE Products Liability
as 10-4329
Plaintiff:
Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
The City of New York, City of NY, The Water Board and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant:
Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-500
Cross-Claimant:
Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
In Re: MTBE Products Liability
as 10-4135
Plaintiff:
Donna Berisha, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Steven C. Greene, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melanie J. Arcure, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The City of New York and City of NY
Consolidated-Defendant:
Total Petroleum Puerto Rico Corporation and Total Oil, Inc.
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Flint Hills Resources, LP
Third-Party-Defendant:
Northville Industries Corporation, John and Jane Does Nos. 1-500, John and Jane Does Nos. 501-1000 and others
Cross-Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-500
Defendant-Third-Party - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Cross-Claimant:
Colorado Refining Company, Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company, TPI Petroleum, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, BP Amoco Corporation, Chevron Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
City of Mishawaka v. Uniroyal Holding, Inc.
as 09-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF MISHAWAKA, INDIANA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIROYAL, INCORPORATED, as succesor to Uniroyal Inc and U S Rubber
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
