Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Carmichael v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Roderick Carmichael
Defendant:
Brown, Sgt, CO1 Hughes, CO2 Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Renaldo Arnold
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Classification Department, Social Services and others
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Darryl Elton Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Antonio McClain, Corrections Officer Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bolling et al
as 2:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Moore, Thaddeus Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jaywann Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Stewart et al
as 1:2019cv00428
Plaintiff:
Andre Deon Jones
Defendant:
Classification Specialist Despain, Warden Rayborn and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdsong v. Ivey et al
as 1:2019cv00252
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Regina Bolar and others
Plaintiff:
Gabrien Birdsong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Estes et al
as 4:2018cv01303
Defendant:
Speck, Dewayne Estes, William DeSpain and others
Plaintiff:
William Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. Baker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dwain Matthew Bagby
Defendant:
John Baker, Ventress Correctional Facility, Ventress Classification Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Ventress Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Henson
Defendant:
Ventress Correctional Facility, Classification and Mental Health Officials, Mrs. Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
