Cases 11 - 20 of 1,191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Raimos
as 24-563
Respondent:
ALEX RAIMOS, Aleandro Claudio Sr., Al Claudio and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Raymond Claudio
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
CLAUDIO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CLAUDIO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10686
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
US v. Mora-Torres
as 24-1215
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CLAUDIO JOSE MORA-TORRES, a/k/a Claudio Jose Mora-Roque
Claudio v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lexus Claudio
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEZA VALVERDE v. ECO CARPET & FLOORING LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Zoylo Lenin Meza Valverde
Defendant:
Eco Carpet & Flooring, LLC, Claudio Ortiz and ECO CARPET & FLOORING LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
