Cases 1 - 10 of 15
LEWIS v. MILBURG et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
LOREN CLYDE LEWIS
Defendant:
BRANDON MILBURG and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al-Bustani v. Alger et al
as 3:2022cv05238
Defendant:
Kay Stone, Sean B Alger, Steve Outtrim and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Hareth Al-Albustani and Al-Hareth Al-Bustani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Lewis v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Chief Clouse, Deputy Chief Kalfas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05211
Defendant:
Kay Stone, Sean B Alger, Steve Outtrim and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Hareth Al-Albustani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Louis Randolph v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 22-15385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES STOGNER, Chaplain NNCC, JUSTIN, swald Justin Reyes per [43] -Food Staff Manager (SDCC) and others
Lewis v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis and Louis Randolph
Defendant:
M. Travis, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv11821
Defendant:
Rochelle Phipps, City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hyman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
