Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cunningham v. Taylor et al
as 4:2026cv07294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Demon Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Taylor, Michael Skinner, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06542
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Coleman v. Russell et al
as 2:2026cv01926
Plaintiff:
Travis Clinton Coleman
Defendant:
Coby Russell and Bailee Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Martinez
as 26-10473
Plaintiff:
Joshua Coby Clem
Defendant:
Carlos Martinez, Crocket County Constable, in his individual and official capacity, Susan Werner, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Tom Green County, Texas, in her official capacity and Chris Taylor, County Attorney, Tom Green County, Texas, in his individual and official capacity
Coby v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2026cv01355
Plaintiff:
Cristique Leonna Coby
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holmes v. Reusch, et al.
as 26-2852
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLMES
Defendant:
JASON REUSCH, NLVPD P#2511, LOREN COOLEY, NLVPD P#2147, DOTTY'S CASINO CEO and others
Espinal v. Sound Vision Care, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02491
Plaintiff:
Carolina Liora Espinal
Defendant:
Sound Vision Care, Inc., Terell Lovell, Dr. Jeffrey Williams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00290
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
