Cases 1 - 10 of 293
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Torkelsen v. Braun
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Defendant:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Shepherd
as 24-6054
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
COLBY SCOTT SHEPHERD, AKA Colby Scott Shephard
Hale-El (PS) v. Centennial State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Centennial State Prison, State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Ramirez, Kramer and Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Husley et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Husley, Hunsberger, Ryan Florres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. State of Nebraska
as 4:2024cv03040
Petitioner:
Colby I. McCray
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres and Philip Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
