Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03747
Petitioner:
Andrew Condon
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCulley (PS) v. Arapahoe County Sherrif's Office et al
as 1:2023cv02418
Plaintiff:
Carisa James McCulley
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Sherrif's Office, Arapahoe County Det Ctr, Lanstov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv01808
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
J Lynch, D Gonzales, A. Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Condon
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Justin Jurkowski, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. USA
as 5:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Stephen Condon Peters
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lightfeather v. Condon et al
as 8:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Patrick Condon, Christopher Siefert and Carol Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Hartman et al
as 8:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Claudis Hartman, Patrick Condon, Christopher Siefert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Lancaster County Courts et al
as 8:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Lancaster County Courts, Hon. McManaman, Christopher Siefert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
