Cases 21 - 30 of 1,670
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Love #769942 v. Bigalow et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Love #769942
Defendant:
Unknown Bigalow, Unknown Rideout, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Jackson County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Executor:
Ronda Grimes
Defendant:
Jackson County Detention Center, Jackson County, Kentucky, Brian Gabbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Black #359135 v. Cook et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Eliejuawan James Black #359135
Defendant:
Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryan, Unknown Schutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett #200640 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Tagget, Unknown Boris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Trowbridge et al
as 5:2024cv10393
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Beth Trowbridge, Deborah Foster, Howard and others
Cooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lore N. Cooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
