Cases 31 - 40 of 1,456
Oklahoma State of v. Corey Jackson corp.sole
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Corey Jackson corp.sole doing business as Corey Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
FOUAD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
OMAR MOHSEN IBRAHIM FOUAD
Defendant:
Deputy NASHAN WILLIAMS, Deputy VINCENT CORNELIUS, Deputy COREY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyle et al v. City of Fountain et al
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Shawna Boyle
Defendant:
Shawna (I) Boyle, City of Fountain, Zackary Corey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Betit v. Morin
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Corey Betit
Defendant:
Cameron Morin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pannhurst v. Hagerman Fire District et al
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Nicole Pannhurst
Defendant:
Hagerman Fire District, Hagerman Fire Department, Tim Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Struve v. Salgado et al
as 5:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
COREY TERILL STRUVE
Defendant:
ARTURO SALGADO and MICHELLE KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ridgley v. Fritts et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Ridgley
Defendant:
Corey R. Fritts and Joseph P. Lopinto, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pickle v. Minnesota Association of Townships et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pickle
Defendant:
Minnesota Association of Townships, Jeffrey S. Krueger, Steven M. Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
