Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Copeland v. Corizon LLC
as 2:2018cv00976
Defendant:
Corizon LLC
Plaintiff:
Michele Copeland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Garrett v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00972
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Alabama Department of Corrections, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Shelena Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. CORIZON LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00444
Defendant:
E PEREZ-LUGO, CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Melton et al
as 2:2018cv00645
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Gearhart v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 18-12022
Interested Party:
KENNETH G. GEARHART
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, LLC and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TRACY COPELAND, ARCHIE GREEN, AMADO PARRA and others
HUFF v. CORIZON LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01338
Plaintiff:
RYAN HUFF
Defendant:
CORIZON, LLC, DANIEL CHERRY, CHRISTINE NOBLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Gearhart v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 18-12022
Interested Party - Appellant:
KENNETH G. GEARHART
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, LLC and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
TRACY COPELAND, ARCHIE GREEN, AMADO PARRA and others
Johnson v. Corizon Health, Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sandra Foy Johnson
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc, Corizon LLC, Clayton M. Ramsu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEPRIEST v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
JON DUKE DEPRIEST
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, CORIZON LLC, CENTURION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOERNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kim Brian Woerner
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Julie L. Jones, Tom Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
