Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hensley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Hensley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. McFarland et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00910
Defendant:
Corey Welch, Sgt. Wilson, John McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 7:2019cv02065
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Cardaro Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Corizon LLC
as 2:2018cv00976
Defendant:
Corizon LLC
Plaintiff:
Michele Copeland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Garrett v. Corizon LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00972
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Alabama Department of Corrections, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Shelena Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Melton et al
as 2:2018cv00645
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv02133
Plaintiff:
Charles Powers
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC , Wilcotte Rahming, Marianne Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Charles Butts
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baisden v. Corizon LLC et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00627
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Defendant:
Corizon LLC and Dental Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
