Cases 81 - 90 of 389
Thomas Farr v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 17-5482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. FARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, LLC, CORIZON, INC., DR. CRUMP and others
BERRY v. JAY, et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT BERRY and JAVON LANCE CROCKETT BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON INC and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv06051
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash , Lora Lakey , Shannon Tyrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2017cv06052
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash , Lora Lakey , Stacy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Yordy et al
as 1:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Keith A Brown, Steven J Rendon and Daniel L Dixon
Defendant:
Keith Yordy, Randy Blades, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honaker v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Honaker
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. CORIZON INC.
as 2:2017cv00145
Defendant:
CORIZON INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MASON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teets v. Judd et al
as 8:2017cv00641
Plaintiff:
William Jason Teets
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Jeff Henry, Jerrice Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston #194241 v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Cory Coston #194241
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. , Keith Papendick, Erin Orlebeke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00798
Defendant:
BAKER, BRUEBAKER, CORIZON LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
