Cases 51 - 60 of 506
Fairbanks (ID 117436) v. Lopez et al
as 5:2020cv03084
Defendant:
Jose A. Lopez and Corizon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua H. Fairbanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White #228524 v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00948
Defendant:
Peter E. Sices, Corizon Inc., Unknown Stillman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Earl White #228524
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 19-35917
Defendant / Appellant:
MURRAY YOUNG, CORIZON, INC., JEFF ZUMDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Helburn v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Dr. April Dawson, Warden Ramirez, Corizon Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrin LaPine v. Corizon Inc., et al
as 19-2224
Defendant / Appellee:
SUBRINA AIKEN, JEFFREY STIEVE, Doctor, PAMELLA FRIESS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Issac v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00173
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Issac
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Department of Corrections Officials, Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 19-35552
Defendant / Appellant:
MURRAY YOUNG, CORIZON, INC., JEFF ZUMDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Fuller v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01705
Plaintiff:
Gerald Davis Fuller
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, RNP, Corizon, Inc. and Frank B. Bishop
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General and Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
