Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Pope v. William(LNU) Summit Supervisor et al
as 1:2019cv00697
Defendant:
Miguel (LNU) line lead (Summit), Cornfield, Inc., Summit Staffing and others
Plaintiff:
Jermel Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORNFIELD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
LYNN CORNFIELD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL ("PCPC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORNFIELD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
LYNN CORNFIELD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL ("PCPC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cornfield et al v. Ally Financial, Inc.
as 2:2017cv12682
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cornfield and Max Cornfield
Defendant:
Ally Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cornfield v. Gamedayr Media Network, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cornfield
Defendant:
Gamedayr Media Network, LLC , Anthony Campanella and Glenn McGraw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cunningham v. Newport Marketing, LLC
as 3:2014cv02400
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Newport Marketing, LLC, Newport Hospitality, LLC, Newport Vacation Manager, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Candyland, Inc. v. Cornfields, Inc.
as 0:2014cv03119
Plaintiff:
Candyland, Inc.
Defendant:
Cornfields, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
GESS GESS & SCANLON, P.C. v. OWENS, ESQ. et al
as 2:2012cv03033
Plaintiff:
GESS GESS & SCANLON, P.C.
Defendant:
DAVID B. OWENS, ESQ., SEAN P. KING, ESQ., OWENS & KING, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
