Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Jones v. Warden Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Corrections Officer Hill and HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLEDGE v. BOLT et al
as 1:2020cv00336
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALLEN SLEDGE
Defendant:
ALL STAFF OF THE ERIE COUNTY PRISON, CAPTAIN MITCHELL CARMAN, CAPTAIN SHAWN BOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corkell v. May et al
as 1:2019cv01844
Defendant:
Warden May, Correctional Officer Maddox and Correctional Officer Hill
Plaintiff:
Isaac Pierce, Jason Allen Corkell and Te'von Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osbourne v. Hardy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00535
Defendant:
Mr. S. Hardy, Mr. Correctional Officer Hill and Mr. CO Womack
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Osbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genereux v. Kenton County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dmitri Genereux
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Anna C. Mischell, Corrections Officer Nicholas Leek, Corrections Officer Thomas Ealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Patterson v. John Rozenick, et al
as 16-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROZENICK, Correctional Officer, Hill Correctional Center, ROSS FORD, BRADLY M. LIVINGSTON, Lieutenant, Hill Correctional Center and others
Quasim Bolling v. Victor Carter, et al
as 15-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUASIM BOLLING
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTOR CARTER, Correctional Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DAVIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HILL and others
Lindsay v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00399
Plaintiff:
Stephon Lindsay
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Warden Cummins, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
