Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Roy Correll
as 22-7414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY CHAPMAN CORRELL
US v. Kevin Green
as 22-4636
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN CORRELL GREEN
Correll v. Hirshfeld
as 22-1420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN P. CORRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Correll v. Hirshfeld
as 22-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN P. CORRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Correll v. Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property ("Director")
as 1:2021cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kevin P Correll
Defendant:
Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property ("Director")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lumsden v. Lumpkin
as 21-50188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain A. Martinez, Jane Cockerham, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and others
Ortiz v. Collier
as 20-20635
Defendant / Appellee:
Alisha Chiles, M. Lewandowski, Bryan Collier and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Ortiz
Correll v. Iconic Mortgage Corp.
as 1:2020cv24858
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Correll
Defendant:
Iconic Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
