Cases 1 - 10 of 1,971
Isham v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Isham
Defendant:
Chief Craig Richardson, Sergeant Kenneth Lloyd, Scott Kinderdine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Redmond v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jennings Redmond
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association doing business as Ultron Processing Services doing business as U.S. Bank, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, U.S. Bank Trust National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Hickey v. Stump et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kainte Hickey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stump, Correctional Officer Nelson, Correctional Officer Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.S. v. Craig McCrumb, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
C.S., by her next friend, Adam Stroub
Defendant:
CRAIG MCCRUMB, AMY LEFFEL and MICHAEL PAPANEK
Patton v. Frank et al
as 4:2024cv11129
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank, Shae, Vanwormer and others
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
