Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00992
Respondent:
David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Walter Hensley
Petitioner:
William Craig Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Miller v. Nutribullet, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Nutribullet, L.L.C., Capital Brands, L.L.C., Call to Action, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00164
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Marsha Johns and Naughton
Plaintiff:
Craig Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Alfredo De Ferraz v. City of Hemet, California
as 5:2016cv02660
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alfredo De Ferraz and Joseph A De Ferraz
Defendant:
City of Hemet, California, Does 1 through10 and Matthew Gomez
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Barry V. Freeman and Craig Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Craig Miller v. Jeffrey Beard
as 5:2016cv00105
Respondent:
Dr. Jeffrey Beard
Petitioner:
Richard Craig Miller
Craig R Miller et al v. City of Santa Monica et al
as 2:2012cv08500
Plaintiff:
Paloma Bennett, Lisa Brisse, MZA Events Inc and others
Defendant:
City of Santa Monica and Does
Miller v. Cox et al
as 3:2012cv00319
Defendant:
James Cox, Nevada Department Of Corrections, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00943
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Boone, Sr., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BOONE, Sr., SHARON MOSBY, Estate of Ronald Boone and ESTATE OF RONALD EULICE BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES BECK, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
