Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Andrew Smith, et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorpor, et al
as 11-2625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SMITH, ANDREW LAPORTE, JASON LOWE and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SPRADER, LORNE COUCH, DAVID RHEAD and others
Defendant:
COMPUTERTRAINING.COM, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLIE MAE INC.
Potter v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv06047
Petitioner:
Ronald Craig Potter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrew Smith, et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorpor, et al
as 11-1355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SMITH, ANDREW LAPORTE, JASON LOWE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMPUTERTRAINING.COM, INCORPORATED and SALLIE MAE INC.
Alston v. City of Elk Grove et al
as 2:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
CD Alston
Defendant:
City of Elk Grove, Elk Grove Police Department, Robert Lehner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. ComputerTraining.com, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv11490
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith , Andrew Laporte , Jason Lowe and others
Defendant:
ComputerTraining.com, Incorporated, ComputerTraining.edu, LLC and CTCI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ronald Potter
as 09-30266
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD CRAIG POTTER
POTTER et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 5:2009cv67141
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CRAIG POTTER and SHERRY H POTTER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Potter et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2009cv00768
Plaintiff:
Stephen Craig Potter and Sherry H Potter
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
USA v. Ronald Potter
as 08-30096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD CRAIG POTTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
