Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Webster et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13632
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Webster, Vanessa Thomas, Ferdinand Pacis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Swenson et al v. Wu et al
as 4:2025cv05561
Plaintiff:
Richard V. Swenson and Lori J. Swenson
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Sasha Kelterborn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Webster et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv08669
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Webster, Vanessa Thomas, Ferdinand Pacis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv08199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gidaro v. Wu et al
as 4:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gidaro
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Yeelong Tan Balladon and others
Marti et al v. Wu et al
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Yeelong Tan Balladon and others
Bhavsar v. Microvast Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar, Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Yang Wu, Craig Webster, Yeelong Tan Balladon and others
Schelling v. Microvast Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
Kim Schelling
Defendant:
Microvast Holdings, Inc., Yang Wu and Craig Webster
US v. Craig Webster
as 19-6383
Defendant / Appellant:
CRAIG WEBSTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Webster v. USA - 2255
as 8:2018cv00315
Petitioner:
Craig Webster
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
