Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Dorletha Lambert v. Randy Philhours, et al
as 24-1831
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lasha Lambert
Defendant:
Randy F. Philhours, Judge, Craighead County Circuit Court, Charlene Henry, Prosecuting Attorney, Craighead County, David Vaughn, Trial Court Circuit Clerk, Craighead County and others
Gillion v. Craighead County Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Demarion Gillion
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Webster v. Doe
as 23-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Doe, Sheriff, Department Head, Craighead County
Angel v. Craighead County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Micah Angel
Defendant:
Craighead County Sheriff's Office and Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Angel v. Craighead County Assessors Office
as 3:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Micah Angel
Defendant:
Craighead County Assessors Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. Craighead County Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ellis
Defendant:
Craighead County Sheriff and Keith Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Craighead County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ellis
Defendant:
Craighead County Sheriff's Office and Keith Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
James D Ward
Defendant:
Marty Boyd and Craighead County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Marty Boyd and Craighead County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarman v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brandon Guy Jarman
Defendant:
Marty Boyd and Craighead County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
