Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Credigy Receivables, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv01477
Plaintiff:
Margaret L. Smith, Margaret L. Smith and Margaret L. Smith
Defendant:
Credigy Receivables, Inc.,, Credigy Services Corp.,, Gryphon Corp., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shipley v. Credigy Receivables, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Doris L Shipley
Defendant:
Credigy Receivables, Inc., Credigy Services Corp., Stewart & Associates, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Luna v. Credigy Receivables, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
Iraida Luna
Defendant:
Credigy Receivables, Inc. and Credigy Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wenzel v. Credigy Service Corp et al
as 2:2007cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victoria Wenzel
Defendant:
Credigy Service Corp, Credigy Receivables, Inc., Brett M Samsky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
