Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mitchell v. The City of Roswell Georgia et al
as 1:2026mi00114
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell and Pablo Crenshaw
Defendant:
The City of Roswell Georgia, Roswell GA. Police Department, Lt. Jason Wescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Another Nine, LLC v. "Nother Nine Golf LLC et al
as 0:2026cv02667
Plaintiff:
Another Nine, LLC
Defendant:
'Nother Nine Golf LLC, Garrett Crenshaw, Owen Gage Hinson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Devin CrenshawIn re: Devin Crenshaw
as 26-3563
Petitioner:
In re: DEVIN CRENSHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. The City of Roswell Georgia et al
as 1:2026mi00098
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell and Pablo Crenshaw
Defendant:
The City of Roswell Georgia, Roswell GA. Police Department, LT. Jason Wescott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Fluker et al
as 3:2026cv05542
Petitioner:
Kayona Crenshaw
Respondent:
Marquise Fluker, Remann Hall Juvenile Court and Pierce County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Gruff v. Henry McMaster
as 26-6616
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY GRUFF
Defendant:
HENRY MCMASTER, Governor of South Carolina, MAGISTRATE HENDRICKS, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina and others
Bryant v. Blair et al.
as 4:2026cv01175
Plaintiff:
Kirkland L. Bryant, III
Defendant:
L. Blair, K. Hoover, J. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
