Cases 1 - 10 of 58
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWAY v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONWAY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, CO- MOWREY, CO MOWREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT. KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson et al v. Crose
as 8:2023cv02564
Plaintiff:
John Nelson and Victoria Nelson
Defendant:
Cassandra Crose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLACE v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY J. BLICHA, LT. S. KOPCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Howells
as 3:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Defendant:
David Howells, Kyle Williams, Kyle McCollin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Danville Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Martez Johnson
Defendant:
Danville Police Department, Kaitlyn Swisher, Scott Shower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Crosely et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Hector Ahumada Perez
Defendant:
Eric Crosely and Cody Mumaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29409
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD CROSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
