Cases 41 - 50 of 555
Culpepper v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv15354
Plaintiff:
Alandrius Culpepper
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Culpepper v. Kemp et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Marquel R. Culpepper
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp, Timothy C. Ward, Victoria Darrisaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culpepper v. Apotex Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv10567
Plaintiff:
Patrick Culpepper
Defendant:
Apotex Corp., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Culpepper, Jr v. Centurion Health Care Services et al
as 2:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
Eugene Culpepper, Jr
Defendant:
Centurion Health Care Services and Rachell Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Thaddeus Culpepper
as 23-50001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THADDEUS J. CULPEPPER
Culpepper v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2022cv05379
Plaintiff:
Paula Culpepper
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
USA v. Thaddeus Culpepper
as 22-50309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THADDEUS J. CULPEPPER
Munn v. Singleton et al
as 4:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Willie Munn
Defendant:
Sheriff James Singleton, Jail Administrator James Wise, Guard Kadao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
