Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,700
Reginald Dunahue v. Curry Branham, et al
as 24-1983
Plaintiff: Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant: Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Avery, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Tucker Max, ADC and others
CURRY v. USA
as 4:2024cv00197
Petitioner: JOSHUA CURRY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant: B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cohns v. Mixon et al
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff: Rodric D Cohns
Defendant: Quintin Mixon, Curry Branham, William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08002
Petitioner: Ameche Lashuan Curry
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Estella Curry v. Warden
as 24-11128
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant: FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
TANNER v. FRENCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant: FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amphly v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: Michael Joseph Amphly
Defendant: State of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?