Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States v. Curtis Evans, Jr.
as 21-1523
Defendant / Appellant:
Curtis Earl Evans, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Curtis Tucker, Jr.
as 17-3503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS EARL TUCKER, JR., aka Reginald T. Shannon
Evans v. USA
as 4:2016cv00771
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Earl Evans, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
State of Alabama v. $504,135 U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2015cv00853
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
$504,135 U.S. Currency, Curtis Earl Pope, Jr. , Lloyd Foshall McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
United States of America v. $504,135.00 in United States Currency (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$504,135.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Curtis Earl Pope, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Curtis Scarver v. Warden, et al
as 14-12933
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS EARL SCARVER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Earls et al v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Curtis Earls and Kamnsha Durham-Earls
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Seattle Police Chief , Unknown Srgnt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earls v. King County Municipal Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Curtis Earls
Defendant:
King County Municipal Corp., Juan V Gil and John Uraquart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarver v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Curtis Earl Scarver
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Jackson, Jr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-20263
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS EARL JACKSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
