Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Howard v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14678
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Georgia et al
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Georgia, State of, Indiana State Police, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Chaka Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Colclough et al
as 2:2019cv00324
Defendant:
Curtis Howard, Phoenix, City of and Ramel Colclough
Plaintiff:
Andres Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Marta/ATU local 732 et al
as 1:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Gregory Davis
Defendant:
Marta/ATU local 732, James Biscoe, Leonard Beckett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Curtis Howard v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al
as 11-13990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, MARTIN & BRUNAVS LAW OFFICE and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC.
Howard v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02248
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howard
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC , Martin & Brunavs Law Office and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
James Dimon , Gunar Brunavs and Bill Beckmann
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Curtis Howard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Howard v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01662
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howard
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC and Martin & Brunavs Law Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOWARD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51687
Plaintiff:
CURTIS HOWARD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
