Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nolen v. Howell et al
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kinta Nolen
Defendant:
Patricia A Howell and Percy D Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Bush
as 4:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Steven P Bush
Plaintiff:
Karen D Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03035
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Arnold
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02179
Plaintiff:
Wendel Adolph Schmidt , Wendel Schmidt Farms , Daniel V. Arnold and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sam Williams v. Franklin Chambers, et al
as 10-2461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sam Williams, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey W. Williams, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
Franklin D. Chambers, individually, George D. Arnold, individually, Phelps County, Missouri, a municipal entity and others
Arnold v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05135
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Arnold
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Life Insurance Company of North America, Plan Administrator and CIGNA Group Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Williams et al v. Chambers et al
as 4:2007cv01409
Plaintiff:
Sam Williams, Sam Williams and Sam Williams
Defendant:
Franklin D. Chambers, George D. Arnold, Phelps County, Missouri, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erven, et al v. Blandin Paper Co, et al
as 0:2004cv00115
Plaintiff:
Randy Erven, Michael Richards, Richard Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
