Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Ishee et al
as 3:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont James and Terrance Lamount James
Respondent:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Stephen Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrance James v. Roy Cooper
as 23-6756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY COOPER, Governor, ROBERT LEE GUY, Lieutenant Governor, FORREST D. BRIDGES, Judge, Cleveland County and others
USA v. Donta D. Bridges
as 23-2183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DONTA D. BRIDGES
James v. Cooper et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Ralph Gilbert, III, Douglas Gold, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. El Paso County Deputy et al.
as 3:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
El Paso County Deputy, Nathaniel Pierce, D. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03183
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie M. Buffaloe, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southard v. Bridges et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Southard, II
Defendant:
D. Bridges and J. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03110
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Todd Pomeroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metz v. Bridges et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
George D. Metz, II
Defendant:
D. Bridges and J. Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
