Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Herman Tamrat v. County of Alameda, et al
as 23-15936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMAN TAMRAT
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a Municipal Corporation, ALAMEDA COUNTY SANTA RITA JAIL ADMINISTRATION, GREGORY J. AHERN and others
Andrew Lopez v. D. Thomas
as 23-15255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW RICK LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
D. C. THOMAS, Correctional Officer
Herman Tamrat v. County of Alameda, et al
as 22-15058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMAN TAMRAT
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a Municipal Corporation, ALAMEDA COUNTY SANTA RITA JAIL ADMINISTRATION, GREGORY J. AHERN and others
Woodard v. Wallace et al
as 3:2020cv00991
Plaintiff:
Melvin Woodard
Defendant:
S R Griffis, D C Phillips and Tapia M Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zone v. RPDC 1 et al
as 1:2020cv00819
Defendant:
R P D C 1, Warden Dauzat, Warden Mallett and others
Plaintiff:
Dontaevious Zone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODARD v. WALLACE et al
as 4:2020cv00311
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WOODARD
Defendant:
S R GRIFFIS, D C PHILLIPS and TAPIA M WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. W G D C Detention Center
as 9:2020cv00980
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Smith
Defendant:
W G D C Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wayne County Jail D/C et al
as 2:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Jerry E. Ray, John G. Carter, Donald L. Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Terrell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWELL v. TALTON
as 5:2019cv00361
Defendant:
SHERIFF CULLEN TALTON, JEANIE VAUGHN, CAPTAIN GARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROOKS HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04095
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Sims
Defendant:
Fulton Reception & Diagnostic Correctional Center, Missouri Department of Corrections, F R D C C Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
